The Problem with Icon-Making in Champagne Criticism

A fundamental failure in modern wine criticism is the tendency to elevate certain producers — Cédric Bouchard, Ulysse Collin — onto a pedestal. This process of icon-making has consequences: market prices skyrocket, scarcity is exaggerated, and consumers are left with the impression that greatness lies only with a handful of names.

Yet anyone who tastes widely across Champagne quickly discovers a different truth: the differences in quality are not nearly as large as market prices suggest. Maybe in the past, when choices were fewer, such distinctions carried more weight. Today, with dozens of talented growers working at the highest level, turning a few producers into icons distorts the landscape more than it clarifies it.

Criticism that feeds the cult of a few names risks failing its readers: it narrows focus, drives prices out of reach, and hides the diversity and quality that Champagne now offers.

When a Critic Admits Limits: William Kelley on Champagne Styles